Mode: category-match. trading_events.category = 'Economics' matched 1,139 active markets closing within 45 days on the live Kalshi mirror, so no theme-mode keyword search was needed. The latest 5-minute snapshot cycle was joined against those markets and the Stage-1 mechanical screen applied (24h volume ≥ 1,500, spread ≤ 5¢, not already ≥95/≤5, no announcer-noise markets, nothing on the already-published list). That left 42 liquid contracts collapsing into ~16 distinct questions. Each survivor got the full Stage-2 treatment: rules text pulled from the mirror, 14-day intraday price history, live Kalshi orderbook, and primary-source news diligence (four parallel research sweeps: CPI data, gasoline/oil, the Maine Senate situation, and Musk/misc).
Context that shaped everything this week: the US–Iran / Strait of Hormuz war re-escalated on July 7–8 (tanker attacks, US strikes on 80+ targets, Trump declaring the June 17 MoU "over"). WTI rose ~5–7% and RBOB ~6% today, and every Kalshi gas market repriced violently intraday — which put the entire gas complex behind the Stage-3 "price already moved in the last 48h" screen. Separately, the June 17 MoU had crashed oil during June (AAA retail fell $4.24 → $3.83), setting up a rare negative June CPI headline print. The deployable edge this run is concentrated in the July 14 CPI release.
Stage-2.5 resolver checks earned their keep: the single "safest-looking" candidate (gasoline CPI index > 342, offered at 97¢) turned out to resolve on the seasonally adjusted FRED series CUSR0000SETB01 — not the NSA series the headline suggests. On NSA math it was a 14%-cushion lock; on the actual SA series my point estimate lands at 344.2, two points from the strike. The pick was killed, and the same analysis produced a better trade on a sibling strike (Pick 3). Note: two Maine Senate nominee markets surfaced under the Economics category (upstream miscategorization); they were diligenced as found and rejected on their merits.
Already-published picks were excluded up front. The only direct overlap was the July Fed decision cluster (KXFEDDECISION-26JUL-H0 YES is live), so its siblings (H25, KXFED-26JUL-T3.75) were rejected as duplicates of a published thesis.
| Market | Question | Price (bid/ask) | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| KXCPICOREYOY-26JUN-T2.7 | Core CPI YoY > 2.7% (June) | 84/85 | PICK 1 — BUY YES |
| KXCPIYOY-26JUN-T3.7 | Headline CPI YoY > 3.7% (June) | 66/67 | PICK 2 — BUY YES |
| KXUSGASCPI-26JUL14-T344 | Gasoline CPI (SA) > 344 (June) | 84/85 | PICK 3 — BUY NO (lottery) |
| KXUSGASCPI-26JUL14-T342 | Gasoline CPI (SA) > 342 (June) | 94/97 | REJECT — resolver reads SA; "lock" is negative-EV at ask |
| KXUSGASCPI-26JUL14-T345 | Gasoline CPI (SA) > 345 (June) | 41/43 | REJECT — coin-flip band |
| KXCPI-26JUN-T-0.2 | CPI MoM > −0.2% (June) | 33/36 | REJECT — band screen (edge logged) |
| KXCPI-26JUN-T-0.3 | CPI MoM > −0.3% (June) | 78/91 | REJECT — no edge at ask, spread blew out |
| KXCPINDEX-26JUL14-T334.700 | CPI NSA index > 334.700 (June) | 54/56 | REJECT — band screen (edge logged) |
| KXECONSTATCPIYOY-26JUN-T3.8 | CPI YoY exactly 3.8% | 48/52 | REJECT — definitional, priced fair vs ladder |
| KXAAAGASM-26JUL31-3.80 | AAA gas > $3.80 on Jul 31 | 65/68 | REJECT — moved +35¢ today (48h rule) |
| KXAAAGASW-26JUL13-3.880 | AAA gas > $3.88 on Jul 13 | 36/38 | REJECT — moved +32¢ today (48h rule) |
| KXMEDNOMJUL-26AUG01-TJAC | Troy Jackson is ME-Sen Dem nominee on Jul 31 | 47/48 | REJECT — coin-flip band, fluid politics |
| KXMEDNOMJUL-26AUG01-SBEL / -NSHA | Bellows / Shah is nominee on Jul 31 | 20/21 · 16/17 | REJECT — tail band / edge within error |
| KXMUSKNW-26JUL31-T750 | Musk > $750B (Bloomberg, Jul 31) | 90/91 | REJECT — fairly priced |
| KXU3-26JUL-T4.2 | U-3 > 4.2% in July | 55/56 | REJECT — coin flip, no edge |
| KXTBCRUNCHWRAP-26AUG02-* | Crunchwrap avg price (July) | 63/64 | REJECT — unknowable resolver (Stage 2.5) |
| KXFED-26JUL-T3.75 (+H25) | Fed July decision cluster | 23/24 | EXCLUDED — duplicates published pick |
Will core CPI inflation be above 2.7% for the year ending June 2026? Current 84 / 85 · my probability 94% vs market-implied ~85% · entry band: 60–90¢ favorite (86¢) · cluster cpi-june-report.
Thesis. Core CPI YoY printed 2.9% in May (BLS, Jun 10). For NO, the printed June value must fall two tenths to ≤2.7 — requiring a June core MoM around +0.05% against a +0.23% year-ago base. Core has run +0.2 to +0.4 every month of this tariff-and-war inflation cycle (Apr +0.4, May +0.2), and the Cleveland Fed's June core nowcast is +0.23% MoM / 2.85% YoY — comfortably above the 2.75% rounding boundary. The June price data already exists; only the measurement is pending, and every input points the same way. Crucially, the June gasoline collapse does not touch core.
Resolver: BLS CPI release, Jul 14 2026 8:30 ET; printed one-decimal core YoY vs 2.7; delay clause in rules. Priced risks: −1 pt (rounding-boundary measurement noise, release mechanics). Cleanest way to lose: a never-in-this-cycle collapse of June core to ≈0.0% MoM (used vehicles + shelter + services all soft at once).
Will headline CPI inflation be above 3.7% for the year ending June 2026? Current 66 / 67 · my probability 76% vs market-implied ~67% · entry band: 60–90¢ favorite · cluster cpi-june-report.
Thesis. YES needs the printed YoY ≥ 3.8, i.e. a June NSA index ≥ 334.66 (May: 335.123; base June-2025: 322.561) — equivalently June SA MoM above roughly −0.22%. Both credible nowcasts sit clearly on the YES side: Cleveland Fed −0.06% MoM / 3.92% YoY and Goldman −0.13% MoM. The Kalshi MoM ladder is pricing a median near −0.19%, materially more deflationary than either. And the crowd's own books disagree with each other: the specialist gasoline-index ladder (Pick 3's market) implies June SA gasoline ≈ −9% MoM, which through a ~3.2% weight contributes ≈ −0.29pp; with Cleveland's +0.23% core that arithmetic gives headline ≈ −0.08%, not −0.19%. The MoM book appears to be over-extrapolating the June gas crash beyond what the hard EIA data supports; this market is the cleanest favorite-band expression of that.
Resolver: BLS printed one-decimal YoY, Jul 14 8:30 ET; unambiguous, delay clause present. Priced risks: −2 pts (rounding boundary sits inside forecast error; possibility the MoM crowd knows a soft non-energy component I can't see). Those are inside the 76% number. Cleanest way to lose: CPI's own gasoline sample catches the intra-June collapse harder than EIA weekly averages imply, dragging SA MoM below −0.22%.
Will the June 2026 gasoline CPI index (SA, CUSR0000SETB01) print above 344? Current yes 84 / 85 (NO costs ~16¢) · my probability the NO wins: 45% vs market-implied ~16% · entry band: <35¢ tail — deployed under the single lottery slot, capped at 1.6% of capital · cluster cpi-june-report.
Thesis — a variance disagreement with an overconfident book. Hard inputs: May SA gasoline index 378.660 (FRED); June seasonal factor 1.0484 (stable to ±0.04% across 2023–25); EIA weekly retail gives a daily-weighted June/May decline of ≈ −9.1%. That maps to a June SA print of ≈ 344.2. The strike ladder prices a cliff — T344 at 84, T345 at 42 — i.e. the book claims to know the print to within ±0.6 index points. But the CPI's own-outlet gasoline sample historically deviates from EIA-weekly-implied projections by ±1.5 points; and a plausible Monday-only EIA construction (May avg $4.479 vs June $4.050 = −9.59%) lands at 342.3, six points below where the book is centered. At 16¢ the NO needs only ~16% to break even; my σ ≈ 1.6 around 344.2 puts it near a coin flip. This is priced as a lottery, not a conviction bet, precisely because the edge is a second-moment claim.
Resolver: FRED/BLS SA series named explicitly in rules_secondary — verified directly; this same check is what killed the T342 YES "lock". Priced risks: −3 pts equivalent (all-grades vs regular-grade mix, May daily-average construction). Cleanest way to lose: the specialists are right — CPI's June sample tracks the mid-month average (~345) rather than my daily-weighted path, and the print lands 344.5–345.5. Honesty note: this leg's YES was bid up from ~59 to 84 within the last hour — someone is actively buying the ladder today; and the market sits below the run's 1,500 vol24h screen (it entered via diligence on its liquid sibling T342). Both facts argue for the tiny size it got.
| # | Market | Side | Limit | Contracts | Cost | % cap | Conviction / band | Max payout | Edge | EV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KXCPICOREYOY-26JUN-T2.7 | YES | 86¢ | 81 | $69.66 | 7.0% | HIGH · 60–90¢ | $81.00 | +8¢ | +9.3% |
| 2 | KXCPIYOY-26JUN-T3.7 | YES | 67¢ | 45 | $30.15 | 3.0% | MEDIUM · 60–90¢ | $45.00 | +9¢ | +13.4% |
| 3 | KXUSGASCPI-26JUL14-T344 | NO | 16¢ | 100 | $16.00 | 1.6% | LOW · tail (lottery slot) | $100.00 | +29¢ | +181% |
| Total deployed | 226 | $115.81 | 11.6% | Cash held: $884.19 (88.4%) | $226.00 | +$39.53 | +34.1%* | |||
* Blended EV is dominated by the lottery leg's recorded +181%; per v3 policy EV numbers are calibration data only — every position size above came from conviction tier + entry band + cluster cap, and the highest-EV pick is deliberately the smallest.
| Cluster | Picks | Cost | % of capital | Cap (15%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cpi-june-report | 1, 2, 3 | $115.81 | 11.6% | $150 — OK (77% used) |
Yes — the whole book rides one release (BLS CPI, Jul 14, 8:30 ET). That is a deliberate, capped concentration: it was the only place in this category where the screens found defensible edge this week. Two mitigants: total exposure is under the 15% single-thesis cap, and the legs are not all the same direction — Pick 3 (gasoline-soft) partially hedges Pick 2 (headline-firm): if gasoline surprises soft enough to kill the headline YES, the lottery pays 5.3:1 against it.
| Tier | Cost deployed | % of capital | Per-pick cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIGH | $69.66 | 7.0% | 15% ($150) |
| MEDIUM | $30.15 | 3.0% | 7% ($70) |
| LOW | $16.00 | 1.6% | 3% ($30) / 2% lottery |
All 15 rejects below are machine-logged in picks.json and shadow-tracked to settlement — if the rejects outperform the picks, the screen itself is the finding. Stage-3.5 entry-band cuts are marked [BAND].
Data: Kalshi mirror DB (5-minute snapshots through 2026-07-08 16:23 UTC), Kalshi public trade API, BLS/FRED/EIA/AAA primary data, cited press. Method: v3.1 — conviction-weighted and EV-agnostic sizing, entry-band screen, 15% cluster cap, resolver-profiled probabilities with priced deductions; rejects machine-logged and shadow-tracked. Disclaimer: all probabilities are subjective estimates by an automated research process; prediction-market contracts can and do resolve to zero; nothing here is investment advice. Picks in this report enter the public track record and the auto-copy feed.